Article
Examining how marginalized stakeholders successfully redress their issues : a social networks approach
Can marginalized stakeholders whose issues with the firm are unaddressed because of their resource and legitimacy constraints (low salience) increase their salience by capitalizing on certain inherent properties of their stakeholder environment? The purpose of this paper is to examine this question using a real life case of the Coca-Cola controversy in Kerala, India, where a group of local aboriginals succeeded against all odds in shutting down a Coca-Cola plant which was allegedly polluting their water resources. The analysis of the longitudinal data collected in this case supported the hypotheses that the ability of marginalized stakeholders to increase their salience by influencing other stakeholders depends both on the attributes of other stakeholders (favorable, unfavorable and indifferent), and the triadic relationships among them. The triadic relationships among stakeholders show a tendency toward balance, and become particularly relevant when the marginalized stakeholder’s issues are perceived to have low legitimacy due to their normative nature (which makes them difficult to be translated into economic terms). The findings offer important insights to both marginalized stakeholders and firms, on proactively managing their stakeholder environments.
Judul | Edisi | Bahasa |
---|---|---|
Disruptions and supply networks: a multi-level, multi-theoretical relational perspective | Vol. 22 No. 1, 2011 pp. 104-126 | en |
Corporate social responsibility, ethics, and corporate governance | Vol. 8 Iss 4 pp. 547 - 560 | en |
Global logistics : new directions in supply chain management | Fifth Ed. | en |
Application of fuzzy AHP and electre to china dry port location selection | Volume 27 | en |
Rapid realignment : how to quickly integrate people, processes, and strategy for unbeatable performance | en | |
Spatial analysis for an intermodal terminal to support agricultural logistics: A case study in the upper great plains | Vol. 38 Issue: 3, pp.299-319 | en |