Article
Cropland management versus dredging: An economic analysis of reservoir sedimentmanagement
Smith C, Williams J, Nejadhashemi AP, Woznicki S, Leatherman J. 2013. Cropland management versus dredging: An economic analysis of reservoir sediment management. Lake Reserv Manage. 29:151–164.
Erosion of agricultural cropland has been identified as a major source of sediment accumulating in water reservoirs. Emphasis is increasingly on finding the most cost-effective ways to control soil erosion to reduce reservoir sedimentation. In this study, biophysical and economic models for the Tuttle Creek Lake watershed in northeastern Kansas were integrated to determine if implementation of alternative cropland management strategies to reduce reservoir sediment are more cost-effective than dredging. In the Tuttle Creek Lake watershed, we found that if the marginal costs of agricultural best management practices (BMP) implementation become >$6.90/t of sediment reduction, then dredging becomes the economically preferred alternative. Meeting this cost requires that BMP in the form of filter strips and no-till cultivation are implemented in a targeted, cost-effective manner, not in a random pattern of voluntary adoption that may characterize BMP adoption in some watersheds. Although reservoir dredging is clearly expensive, our results show that it is not entirely cost-prohibitive on an annualized per unit basis. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher’s online edition of Lake and Reservoir Management for the following free supplemental resources: definitions of costs and present value] Key words: cropland management, dredging, economics, reservoir sedimentation, watershed management
Judul | Edisi | Bahasa |
---|---|---|
Port economics | Volume 25 Number 2 December 2009 | en |
China's maritime silk road initiative and south asia : political economic analysis of its purposes, perils, and promise | en |