Article
Extending the lifecycle of container mainports in upstream urban locations
My article in the June 1996 issue of this journal considered the relocation of container handling facilities for the largest deep-sea vessels from upstream urban ports to downstream terminals at coastal locations [I]. It was argued in the article that two upstream urban ports (Antwerp and Hamburg) have been unable to relocate their mainport function due principally to territorial (and hence political) constraints. Whilst I welcome the response by Notteboom et al. which seeks to 'clarify, correct and extend the results' of my analysis, with an emphasis on the position of Antwerp, their comments merit this brief rejoinder.
Judul | Edisi | Bahasa |
---|---|---|
Container Terminal Operations | en | |
Maritime policy in the North Sea region : application of the cluster approach | Vol. 16, 4, 484–500 | en |
Dynamic analysis of product lifecycle and sea/air modal choice: evidence of export from Japan | Volume 30 Number 3 December 2014 | en |